[Tagging] Power=cable for low voltage lines?

[Jean-Marc Liotier]

On 10/21/18 11:23 AM, François Lacombe wrote:
> Le dim. 21 oct. 2018 à 09:21, Martin Koppenhoefer 
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
>
>     no, the argument is that this is a basic distinction which anyone
>     can make, without knowing about transmission, distribution or voltage.
>
>     Line is on poles? so it is a minor line. On towers? line.
>
> Which is not true because you find poles more massive than tiny towers.
>
> Big... small... minor... major what does that mean?

height=* then ? A bit harder to describe for the novice contributor, but 
still within reach with no specific technical skills and it adds a 
measure of objectivity to the description. cables=* is even easier. Both 
provide a beginning of importance classification, accessible with no 
domain knowledge of the electric network. Maybe that is the way forward ?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181021/b34660aa/attachment.html>