[Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

SelfishSeahorse selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 12:57:41 UTC 2018

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 12:37, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Le 26. 10. 18 à 09:28, SelfishSeahorse a écrit :
> > What about tagging the presence or absence of traffic signals with a
> > subkey, e.g. crossing:traffic_signals=yes/no?
> it is indeed always possible to take out all the values to make
> them keys.
> but if iD only enters the marking in crossing_ref like the other
> editors, the crossing key will again indicate whether or not there is a
> light. so is it useful to change the name of the key there too?

How would you tag the absence of traffic signals? crossing=no_traffic_signals?

And what about the absence of road markings? crossing_ref=unmarked?

> experience shows that if you want to change everything, in the end
> nothing changes because many contributors have started from immobility
> when the solution is too large. that is why I think it is useful to
> focus on how to correctly inform the type of ground marking

If we can solve the problem with less change that's fine too, but the
solution should be unambiguous and clear.



More information about the Tagging mailing list