[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 14. Apr 2019, at 15:46, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> By using a different key, like "camp_site=*", this is more clearly a
> "sub-feature" of tourism=camp_site


IMHO the tag indicates a subtype of camp site, rather than a feature.
I am not opposing a new key, but why “site”? E.g.
camping=pitch
or
camp=pitch 

There are already types of camping sites tagged with the camp_site key:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/camp_site#values
admittedly fewer than camp_site=camp_pitch

There is also noteworthy usage of 
camp_pitch:type
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/camp_pitch%3Atype

Camping pitches could become their own key:
camp_pitch=motorhome / tent / see taginfo for camp_pitch:type=*

is it camp_pitch or would camping_pitch be better?

Ciao, Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190414/08906f36/attachment.html>