[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Apr 14 15:28:56 UTC 2019

sent from a phone

> On 14. Apr 2019, at 15:46, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> By using a different key, like "camp_site=*", this is more clearly a
> "sub-feature" of tourism=camp_site

IMHO the tag indicates a subtype of camp site, rather than a feature.
I am not opposing a new key, but why “site”? E.g.

There are already types of camping sites tagged with the camp_site key:
admittedly fewer than camp_site=camp_pitch

There is also noteworthy usage of 

Camping pitches could become their own key:
camp_pitch=motorhome / tent / see taginfo for camp_pitch:type=*

is it camp_pitch or would camping_pitch be better?

Ciao, Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190414/08906f36/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list