[Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing
sg.forum at gmx.de
Tue Apr 16 14:42:12 UTC 2019
it feels a bit wrong to me to use cycleway=crossing on a highway=footway
or highway=path, as described on the wiki page
I might have been doing it wrong all the time but I always use
hw=footway + footway=crossing
hw=cycleway + cycleway=crossing
hw=path + path=crossing
Accessibility should imo be tagged using access-tags
bicycle=yes/designated/etc, or implied using default hw=*-values.
Am 16.04.2019 um 15:47 schrieb marc marc:
> Le 16.04.19 à 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :
>> Apr 16, 2019, 2:50 PM by marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com:
>> > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated.
>> highway=path + path=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate
>> or highway=footway + footway=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate
>> is not enought ?
>> It is enough, I rephrased it. Hopefully it is now more redable
>> direct link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing
> yes it's more redable, but i still find it strange.
> I think this tag only makes sense when one of these
> two ways crosses a road :
> highway=path|footway + cycleway=*
> if there is no cycleway=* before the crossing,
> it is normal that the crossing way does not have a cycleway
> e.g. a highway=path + cycleway=no + bicycle=yes crossing a road
> must not have a cycleway=crossing. no cycleway exist there.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging