[Tagging] free_standing_emergency_department, amenity or clinic ?
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Apr 30 14:26:01 UTC 2019
30 Apr 2019, 13:51 by pla16021 at gmail.com:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 05:40, Joseph Eisenberg <> joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>> > wrote:
>> On 4/30/19, Mateusz Konieczny <>> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>>> > wrote:
>> > 29 Apr 2019, 23:11 by >> pla16021 at gmail.com <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>>> :
>> >> Since healthcare=* is now rendered by standard carto, there's no reason to
>> >> include amenity=*.
>> > Please, avoid basing tagging decision on one specific renderer.
>> (Also, that information is no longer correct:
>> >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3731 <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3731>
>> Due to:
>> >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3639 <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3639>
> Hmmmmmmm. I actually checked that healthcare=* rendered by finding an example
> without a corresponding amenity tag. So I'm now confused (which is fairly normal for
It is rendered in a currently used version, version that is not yet used on OSM servers
will include #3731 that drops this rendering.
> I'm also puzzled as to why (if I understand the issue correctly) you'd stop healthcare=*
> rendering for anything just because it fails to render on polygons without an area=yes.
See explanation in https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3731 <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3731>
> This provides inconsistent mapper feedback, suggesting that features need to be
> double-tagged with "amenity" or mapped as a node
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging