[Tagging] Bicycle kitchens, community centres that offer bicycle repairs etc

Leif Rasmussen 354lbr at gmail.com
Wed Aug 7 20:19:58 UTC 2019


I've seen cages that are also bike shops, so whatever tagging solution we
up with should work with any type of shop.
Leif Rasmussen

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 9:38 PM Morten Lange via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wonder how I should tag bicycle shops that are not shops in the
> traditional "buy our products" sense.
>
> A community-centre that is also offers bicycle repairs / is a bicycle
> repair shop.
> Or a bicycle "shop"  that primarily focuses on refurbishing disused bikes.
> Or a community-centre or similar that provides job training for various
> groups, and such training happens through running a bicycle repair service
> for the public.
>
>
> I have found a few such bicycle repair and maintenance "shops" on OSM.
> These are the searches I have used in overpass-turbo.eu:
>
> (shop=bicycle or service:bicycle:repair=yes)  and
> ownership=private_nonprofit
> or
> community_centre=bicycle_maintenance
> or
> service:bicycle:repair=yes  and amenity=community_centre
>
>
> Many of those that I described, to my eperience do not offer
> Do-it-yourself (more on DIY  below).
> They still are something else than your "ordinary"  bikeshop, and I think
> that is significant to reflect in tagging.
> So I wonder how best to tag those.  My experience is that most of them are
> non-profit.
>
>
> My preliminary conclusion is to use this on the nodes I have mapped in
> Oslo and elsewhere in Norway:
>       shop=bicycle
>       service:bicycle:repair=yes
>       ownership=private_nonprofit      (or ownership=public_nonprofit)
>
>
>
> Some additinional thoughts :
>
> A.
> If the place is a Do-it-yourself shop it should be tagged as such.
> Searching for this tag and value I see the pair has been used quite a lot.
> For example for bicycle kitchens.
>      service:bicycle:dyi=yes.
>
> B.
> Tagging primarily as a community centre?
>
> Some might suggest to use amenity=community_centre combined with
>       community_centre=bicycle_maintenance
>
> But then the community centre feature will overshadow the bikeshop aspect.
> (And in current renderings the place would not pop up as a place where you
> can fix your bicycle/tricycle)
> I would like to have it the other way around, that is to emphasise the
> service offered to the public, rather than type of establishment.
>
> Is it OK to use
>        community_centre=bicycle_maintenance
> together with
>       shop=bicycle ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Any other comments?
> Could a single "freshly invented" value do the trick like
>       service:bicycle:repair=work_training
> The downside is that if searching for the value =yes, those
> nodes/ways/relations are not found.
>
>
> Regards / KveĆ°ja / Hilsen
> Morten Lange
>
>
> P.S
>
> Bicycle kitchens and bicycle librarier are somewhat different animals.
>
> Searching the web for bicycle kitchen, bicycle library etc turns up quite
> a few references.
>
> But I could not find them on OSM.
> That is until I specifically searched in overpass-turbo for
>
>     shop=bicycle and service:bicycle:diy=yes
>
> Rome, Paris and Berlin are virtually peppered.
>
>
> And for the case of the bicycle library .....
> Would this be a possibe way to tag them
>       service:bicycle:rental=library
> ?
>
> --
> Morten Lange, Oslo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190807/af663f0b/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list