[Tagging] insurance:health, staff_count:nurses, staff_count:doctors tags documented as a bad idea

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Aug 15 11:39:23 UTC 2019


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:doctors#Voting <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:doctors#Voting>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:nurses#Voting <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:nurses#Voting>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:insurance:health#Voting <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:insurance:health#Voting>

Voting was completed, with results documenting this tag as very bad idea.

Overall, tags were rejected for multiple reasons, with staff_count tags considered as
fundamentally flawed.

All three proposals were clearly rejected.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190815/9ff7bbc0/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list