[Tagging] insurance:health, staff_count:nurses, staff_count:doctors tags documented as a bad idea

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 00:06:37 UTC 2019

On 15/08/19 21:39, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:doctors#Voting
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:staff_count:nurses#Voting
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:insurance:health#Voting
> Voting was completed, with results documenting this tag as very bad idea.
> Overall, tags were rejected for multiple reasons, with staff_count 
> tags considered as
> fundamentally flawed.
> All three proposals were clearly rejected.

The author should be given the opportunity to manage the proposal.
Is there a time limit as to how long voting can run? Two weeks is the 
minimum, not a maximum.
Only 11 people have voted so there have not been a vast number of views.

Only if the author has not responded for some time and no other input 
done should a tidy up be done, say a month of inactivity at least.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190816/1d0291cb/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list