[Tagging] Parking spaces for car charging
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 00:36:17 UTC 2019
amenity=charging _space? Says what it is.
On 26/08/19 08:52, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 23:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick
> <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 23:53, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com
> <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> So it looks like, for the charging spaces, amenity=parking_space +
> access:<invent-appropriate-role>=<access value> is the way
> to go.
>
>
> A bit messy, but how about
> amenity=parking_space + access=vehicle_charging_only
>
>
> Big problem right there: you're expanding on the access tag. Some on
> this list will
> take great exception to that. Some editors will take even greater
> exception to it as
> they populate drop-downs from the wiki, so when you map a road the
> access drop-down
> will include yes, no, private, vehicle_charging_only. Which is why the
> parking_space
> proposal invented access:<role>. And even that is pushing things, a
> little.
>
> car_charging=yes/no
> truck_charging=yes/no
> hgv_charging=yes/no
>
>
> And this will re-open hostilities in a different argument about the
> undesirability of having all
> those different binary tags instead of charging=car|truck|hgv. Or was
> it the other way
> around that was undesirable? I forget now.
>
>
> so you could specify that this space is for car charging only, or
> hgv only (although I don't think buses, trucks & HGVs would be put
> on charge while doing deliveries at the supermarket!)
>
>
> The one I want to map is in a supermarket car park and the parking
> spaces are only big
> enough for a car. But larger vehicles also use that car park, with
> RVs being frequent and
> the UK intends to have all motor vehicles be electric at some future
> date. Eventually
> the supermarket will have a few charging points with spaces that can
> accept RVs.
> Supermarket car parks may never cater to HGVs but other places will
> have to, given the range
> of electric vehicles. I'd prefer it if we don't come up with
> something that only works for cars
> and a few years down the line wish we'd done it differently because we
> now have to handle
> other types of vehicle.
>
> --
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190826/e9b7a7b5/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list