[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 6. Dec 2019, at 19:29, Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think the "forward" and "backward" don't belong in a role of a relation. Oneway=yes on a way should be enough


oneway is generally not considered to apply to pedestrians.
I agree with what Kevin has written, there should be a way to distinguish several cases of forward / backward, those where you can walk in both directions but only one is signposted, and those where you actually can’t use it bidirectionally (e.g. it is too narrow and too much traffic)

Cheers Martin