[Tagging] Proposal - Key:access=restricted
Jarek PiĆ³rkowski
jarek at piorkowski.ca
Sat Feb 23 19:33:50 UTC 2019
Reposting to mailing list, after henkevdb sent to my personal email
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 14:16, henkevdb <mail at henkevdb.be> wrote:
> watercourses ( in Belgium anyway) are (mostly) open to the 'general
> public', so , access=no (with description ; "No access for the general
> public.") is not good then
Don't set general access tag then, and set only what is restricted.
motor_vehicle=private?
> ... also, access=private is not good because
> of description ; "Only with individual permission" ...
What is the problem with this description? Remember that we're tagging
for the general case. If there is an natural emergency and an army
vehicle needs to use it, motor_vehicle wouldn't stop them, and we
shouldn't tag for it.
> also this 'case'
> is better 'suitable' with access=restricted ->
> https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=736136#p736136
access=no, and don't tag highly exceptional uses IMO
Otherwise did you also change the maxheight tag because of the guy
raising the one cable in the photo?
Would you retag a cycleway to exceptional_traffic=emergency if you see
a firefighting vehicle standing on it one day while responding to a
fire?
--Jarek
More information about the Tagging
mailing list