[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

[djakk djakk]

I forgot to mention that there are several kind of road to class : footway,
cycleway, road for cars, road for hybrid, road for psv ;)

Julien “djakk”


Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 10:55, Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035 at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Service roads would be highway=service as it is now.
>
> road_level tag also solves non-primary motorway tagging (motorroad,
> autovia, non-expressway freeway, Polish S-road, Russian limited access
> A-road etc.). You would tag a non-primary motorway as highway=motorway
> road_level=<nonzero>.
>
> 25.02.2019 00:20 tarihinde Graeme Fitzpatrick yazdı:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 00:27, djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com
> > <mailto:djakk.djakk at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello !
> >
> >     I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its
> >     administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least
> >     5 levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large
> >     lanes, link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics.
> >
> >     So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a
> >     residential area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually
> >     walking on it.
> >
> >     So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world
> >     (remember the highway=trunk issue ;-))
> >
> >
> > I could see that working!
> >
> > Replace the existing highway= types (=motorway; =primary etc) with
> > highway=1 to =5?, with 1 being the existing =motorway, down to 5 being
> > all the minor streets in a town.
> >
> > If you have a look
> > at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-28.0643/153.4191 (& I'm
> > pretty sure everywhere around the World will look fairly similar?),
> > the pink Pacific Motorway (=motorway) would become =1; the orange /
> > tan major arterial roads (=primary: 2; 3; 7; 40; 50) =2; yellow
> > connecting roads (=secondary) =3; white roads through suburbs
> > (=tertiary) =4; all the grey minor roads (=residential /
> > unclassified): residential in the suburbs, commercial areas in the
> > CBD, roads inside industrial areas etc =5.
> >
> > Would you need =6 for service roads (driveways, parking lanes etc), or
> > would they stay as the current=service designation?
> >
> > Setting levels like this & rendering them this way, would also get rid
> > of the problem of roads not being visible in remote areas because a
> > "secondary" road won't render - even if it's only hard-packed dirt, it
> > would still be the level 1 or 2 road in this area!
> >
> > Feasible?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Graeme
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190225/c1be5be4/attachment-0001.html>