[Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Jul 12 10:46:35 UTC 2019
12 Jul 2019, 11:50 by 61sundowner at gmail.com:
> On 12/07/19 19:02, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 12 Jul 2019, 10:11 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>> :
>>
>>> On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> sent from a phone
>>>>
>>>>> On 12. Jul 2019, at 09:12, Marc Gemis >>>>> <marc.gemis at gmail.com> <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a
>>>>> private wood / forest in a different way than one that is accessible
>>>>> by the public? Do private parking lots get a different amenity-key ?
>>>>> No, we refine this with additional tags.
>>>>> This method can be applied to private gardens as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For some features we do distinguish, for others not. For example a private bathroom, trash can or water tap would not be tagged like a publicly accessible one (we put generally more focus on usability/accessibility than on ownership).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where are these private bathroom/s, trash can/s and water tap/s you mention Martin?
>>>
>> Public toilet: amenity=toilets
>> Private toilet: not tagged (so not tagged
>> like a public one)
>>
>> I am unable to link to well tagged private
>> toilets as in this case private tagging
>> is to not map it.
>>
>
> A similar logic would have private roads not mapped. Yet they are.
> Same for private buildings, farm yards, woods, beaches and so on.
>
I am not arguing against mapping
private gardens and other objects
that you mentioned.
But mapping private bathrooms and
water taps is not welcome.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190712/4c317d24/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list