[Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

[Mateusz Konieczny]

12 Jul 2019, 11:50 by 61sundowner at gmail.com:

> On 12/07/19 19:02, Mateusz Konieczny      wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 12 Jul 2019, 10:11 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>> :
>>
>>> On 12/07/19 17:25, Martin          Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> sent from a phone
>>>>
>>>>> On 12. Jul 2019, at              09:12, Marc Gemis >>>>> <marc.gemis at gmail.com> <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would a private              garden require a different key? Do we tag a
>>>>> private wood / forest in              a different way than one that is accessible
>>>>> by the public? Do              private parking lots get a different amenity-key ?
>>>>> No, we refine this with              additional tags.
>>>>> This method can be              applied to private gardens as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For some features we do            distinguish, for others not. For example a private bathroom,            trash can or water tap would not be tagged like a publicly            accessible one (we put generally more focus on            usability/accessibility than on ownership).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where are these private          bathroom/s, trash can/s and water tap/s you mention Martin?
>>>
>> Public toilet: amenity=toilets
>> Private toilet: not tagged (so        not tagged
>> like a public one)
>>
>> I am unable to link to well        tagged private
>> toilets as in this case        private tagging
>> is to not map it.
>>
>
> A similar logic would have private roads not mapped. Yet they are.
>  Same for private buildings, farm yards, woods, beaches and so on. 
>
I am not arguing against mapping 
private gardens and other objects 
that you mentioned.

But mapping private bathrooms and
water taps is not welcome.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190712/4c317d24/attachment.html>