[Tagging] Was public_transport=platform intended to always be combined with highway=bus_stop?
selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Wed Jul 31 16:30:52 UTC 2019
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 13:52, Joseph Eisenberg
<joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed, there are enough tags for public transport already. I don't
> think anything new is needed.
My idea was actually to replace the misnamed public_transport=platform
with public_transport=stop and to abandon highway=bus_stop and
railway=tram_stop as well as public_transport=stop_position. All in
all that's not more tags, but three less.
Besides, as there were only one element per stop (even if the stop is
a platform), public_transport=stop_area would only be necessary at
> If there is a platform where buses stop, then there's a bus stop, and
> a platform. The platform is a physical feature, and I believe it would
> still be a highway=platform even if the bus service were discontinued.
I agree, it remains a highway=platform even if it's not operated
anymore. But when it's operated, the platform actually represents a
> The ref= should go on whatever of the two features that it actual
> refers to: if it's on the bus stop sign or pole, it probably
> represents the bus stop, but it might actually refer to the physical
> platform and each different bus route that stops there might have a
> different ref=* for that bus stop.
The number in my example refers to the place where people wait for the
buses, for numbers 1–7 this is the platform and for number 8 it is the
place on the sidewalk. So, where should i put ref=1 ... ref=7
according to you? On highway=platform, on highway=bus_stop or on both?
And which one of them should i add to the route relation? It were a
lot easier if there were just one object.
> Perhaps sometimes you'll have to add the ref=* to both the stop and
> the platform, but that's ok. The public_transport=stop_position +
> =platform + stop_area idea often leads to putting the same ref on 3
> different objects.
> In all other situations (rail platforms, regular bus stops without an
> elevated platform, tram stops etc), the Refined_Public_Transport
> proposal is clearly simpler than using public_transport=* tags, so it
> looks like a good option.
I find that proposal to be inconsistent and unnecessarily complex.
Inconsistent because sometimes highway=bus_stop has to be mapped
beside the road and at other times on the road, and because sometimes
there is one highway=bus_stop for one stop and at other times there is
one highway=bus_stop for two stops. And unnecessarily complex because
it not only requires a stop_area, but also a stop_area_group. In
contrast, my suggestion would only require stop_area's at stations.
More information about the Tagging