[Tagging] Irrigation: ditches, canals and drains
marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 3 20:59:37 UTC 2019
having 2 key with the same meaning is not a good thing.
I'm in favor of deprecing service=irrigation in favor of
usage=irrigation, more consistent with other usage=* values
used on other waterways.
Le 03.06.19 à 22:19, François Lacombe a écrit :
> Hi all
> Regarding the particular situation of service vs usage keys, JOSM team
> wonders if service may be moved to usage
> Don't blame them on "deprecate" word, which should be understood as
> Question is "Should we keep service in use for destination of water
> leading in man made waterways?"
> All the best
> Le ven. 31 mai 2019 à 22:41, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> <mailto:fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> I agree with aqueduct as a system composed of bridges, tunnels,
> pipes and canal (not only a bridge crossing a valley).
> Le ven. 31 mai 2019 à 16:10, Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> a écrit :
> I think that in this case, with only
> tags even a perfect renderer would have a trouble.
> That's right
> It misses a structure
> Tunnel and bridge can eventually help respectively for underground
> and overhead situations.
> Another key or value have to be determined to describe overground
> lining (and other possibilities)
> If the canal have a constant width, it can be added with width=*
> referring to water width at its surface
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging