[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:tourism=camp_pitch
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 10:06:23 UTC 2019
On 10/06/19 13:48, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> How do you handle sites that accept both caravans and tents on
> different pitches?
> I believe you may be thinking about how to choose between
> tourism=camp_site vs tourism=caravan_site for a dual-use campground or
> campsite. I would use camp_site if it is mostly used for tent camping
> and caravan_site if it is mostly used for RVs/caravans.
The OSMwiki says tourism=caravan_site is not for sites that accept tents
The OSMwiki says tourism=camp_site can be used for sites that accept
caravans and/or tents.
Joseph is correct in that some sites allow either a caravan or a tent to
occupy a certain area. So the question remains
How do you handle sites that accept both caravans and tents on different
And I will add
How do you handle sites that accept both caravans and tents on the same
> This new tag is about individual pitches (British English) and can be
> used for a caravan spot or a tent location.
> How do you handle area within such a site that accept both
> caravans and tents? Some
> parts of a site are for caravans only, with hard standing. Other
> parts are just an area of
> grass where you can put a caravan or a tent.
> The proposed tag tourism=camp_pitch can be used for either type: a
> tent pitch or a caravan pitch.
> There was a separate proposal that includes some additional tags that
> can be used to specify if the camp_pitch is used for caravans or
> tents, but I have not updated that proposal yet:
> If tourism=camp_pitch is approved, we can then consider which new
> attributes or subtypes are needed.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging