[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 117, Issue 90, topic 1 & 4: Ban of Ulamm by Woodpeck

bkil bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 22:01:58 UTC 2019

If you could give us a link where we can continue this discussion
without being off topic, I'd gladly chime in with my viewpoint. We had
dozens of mail threads on our local list in this topic in the past
with some good pointers as well.

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:01 PM Mateusz Konieczny
<matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
> 25 Jun 2019, 18:34 by ulamm.brem at t-online.de:
> We must not publish scans of historical maps as our own work, that could violate copyright.
> But if we use the informations shown in historical maps for free hand drawings, we do not violate the copyright for maps.
> [citation needed]
> I am pretty sure that rewriting, redrawing, tracing and making other derivative works is not cancelling
> copyright on the original work.
> See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Derivative_works for exploration about
> this topic in a bit different context, but nearly everything should be applicable and is describing
> situation well.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work is also relatively readable
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list