[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Mar 1 12:13:44 UTC 2019

Feb 28, 2019, 1:24 PM by fernando.trebien at gmail.com:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:58 PM Mateusz Konieczny
> <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> > wrote:
>> Feb 27, 2019, 7:31 PM by >> baloo at ursamundi.org <mailto:baloo at ursamundi.org>>> :
>> motor_vehicle=no would exclude most emergency vehicles.
>> No, it would not. motor_vehicle=no is a legal limitation.
> Currently, it actually would because emergency=* is nested under
> motor_vehicle=* in the access tags hierarchy. [1] So to express that
> motor vehicles (cars, trucks, etc.) are forbidden but emergency
> vehicles are not, both motor_vehicle=no + emergency=yes are required.
> The same would happen if access=no was used instead of
> motor_vehicle=no.
Just because something is written on Wiki page it does not mean that 
it is 100% gluten free revealed truth.

Can you give an example of place where emergency vehicles are
legally forbidden from entering?

> I agree that typically emergency vehicles are allowed essentially
> everywhere due to the nature of their emergency work, so maybe the
> hierarchy should be changed by moving emergency=* to be a sibling, not
> a child of motor_vehicle=*, or perhaps even a sibling of vehicle=*
> since emergency work in certain areas might be provided using human or
> animal-powered modes of transport.
I will try to amend wiki, though maybe in a different way.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190301/0414fa9f/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list