[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Mar 1 14:37:10 UTC 2019




Mar 1, 2019, 3:23 PM by jarek at piorkowski.ca:

> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 09:10, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> > wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access>>>  and >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency>
>> were just modifed
>>
>> Review of
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:emergency&type=revision&diff=1812453&oldid=1606896 <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aemergency&type=revision&diff=1812453&oldid=1606896>
>>
>
> Should "so for example road with {{tag|highway|service}} +
> {{tag|access|private}} may be inaccessible to emergency vehicles if
> there are no mapped physical obstacles." have read "may be
> accessible"? Looks like your second edit might have missed changing
> one negation?
>
> If I understand what you meant correctly, I would write:
>
> "so for example road with {{tag|highway|service}} +
> {{tag|access|private}} may be in fact be accessible to emergency
> vehicles if there are no mapped physical obstacles"
>
Yes, one negation too much. Fixed in 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:emergency&diff=1812514&oldid=1812453 <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:emergency&diff=1812514&oldid=1812453>

Thanks.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190301/a0186803/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list