[Tagging] Superroutes - good, bad or ugly?

marc marc marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 14 22:33:24 UTC 2019


a route_master isn't a superroute, isn't it ?
it's a collection off all variant of a "single" route
  and not several part of one route like superroute for E-network

route_master are well documented/used for bus route
but if someone want to convert a single type=route into a superroute (so 
a type=route having relation as member), imho it's better to make a 
propal with a good doc to allow app to add this case.
if not, currently valid route 'll become unusable in all app.
so sure that's the best/most need thing todo with PT version :(

Le 14.03.19 à 23:25, Phake Nick a écrit :
> It really depends on exactly how complex the route is, something like 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4776035 this bus route can 
> definitely use it. (and I haven't mentioned other similar bus routes 
> with different numbers in different relationship yet)
> 
> 在 2019年3月15日週五 03:31,Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>> 寫道:
> 
>     On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com
>     <mailto:pelderson at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Paul Allen
>         <pla16021 at gmail.com <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>>:
> 
>             On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:09, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com
>             <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>                 I would definitely want routes to be composed of
>                 subroutes which are shared with other routes,
> 
> 
>             I see that as less than useful for any route I know of. 
> 
> 
>         It's useful for longer routes through walking/cycling node
>         networks, using the network signposting.
> 
> 
>     Yeah, I can see it would be.  And for longer bus routes.  Just not
>     for any of the bus routes I know
>     around here and am likely to map.  You end up with the only common
>     segments being very short
>     around a central bus station, then they all diverge.  Once diverged,
>     there is nothing to share.
> 
>     I'm not against such sharing in principle, where it makes sense. 
>     But if it comes at the price
>     that all bus stops have to be in the aggregate relation and not in
>     the subroutes then it becomes
>     useless for my purposes.  And I freely admit that my purposes are a
>     fairly rare case, but I'd
>     still like to handle it.
> 
>     -- 
>     Paul
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 



More information about the Tagging mailing list