[Tagging] Superroutes - good, bad or ugly?
c933103 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 14 23:16:31 UTC 2019
I mean, these route variants can probably be remapped as superroute if
superroute become more popular
2019年3月15日 06:34 於 "marc marc" <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> 寫道：
a route_master isn't a superroute, isn't it ?
it's a collection off all variant of a "single" route
and not several part of one route like superroute for E-network
route_master are well documented/used for bus route
but if someone want to convert a single type=route into a superroute (so
a type=route having relation as member), imho it's better to make a
propal with a good doc to allow app to add this case.
if not, currently valid route 'll become unusable in all app.
so sure that's the best/most need thing todo with PT version :(
Le 14.03.19 à 23:25, Phake Nick a écrit :
> It really depends on exactly how complex the route is, something like
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4776035 this bus route can
> definitely use it. (and I haven't mentioned other similar bus routes
> with different numbers in different relationship yet)
> 在 2019年3月15日週五 03:31，Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com
> <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>> 寫道：
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com
> <mailto:pelderson at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Op do 14 mrt. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Paul Allen
> <pla16021 at gmail.com <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>>:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 15:09, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com
> <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I would definitely want routes to be composed of
> subroutes which are shared with other routes,
> I see that as less than useful for any route I know of.
> It's useful for longer routes through walking/cycling node
> networks, using the network signposting.
> Yeah, I can see it would be. And for longer bus routes. Just not
> for any of the bus routes I know
> around here and am likely to map. You end up with the only common
> segments being very short
> around a central bus station, then they all diverge. Once diverged,
> there is nothing to share.
> I'm not against such sharing in principle, where it makes sense.
> But if it comes at the price
> that all bus stops have to be in the aggregate relation and not in
> the subroutes then it becomes
> useless for my purposes. And I freely admit that my purposes are a
> fairly rare case, but I'd
> still like to handle it.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging