[Tagging] Strange tags

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Mo., 30. Sept. 2019 um 03:41 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny <
kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com>:

> I've not tried to add the information because I eschew controversy.



that's fine, I probably wouldn't have either



> I
> know that on the 'tagging' list there are hard-liners who would even
> challenge adding the peaks' names to the list, on the grounds that the
> names for the most part cannot be observed in the field. (Look at a
> topo map, or ask virtually any local 'what mountain is that big one?'
> while pointing, and you'll get an answer, but for many of these peaks
> I don't think I've ever seen a sign with the name, so I've been told
> that in such a case the name is not verifiable!)



IMHO this would represent just a small minority of people thinking so.
Generally verifiability would be satisfied if you could go in the area and
ask the people, there is no requirement for a sign.

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190930/13a486fc/attachment-0001.html>