[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - more parking types

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 8 23:12:25 UTC 2020


On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 at 03:39, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com>
wrote:

> We already have capacity and capacity=disabled, what's the problem with
> adding more
> capacity:*?
>

But what number do we show for "capacity"?

I started wondering about this after one of the carparks you mentioned in
Quantico recently showed capacity 15, with 11 car spaces + 4 motorbike
spaces. Should that be =15, or =11 + 4?

So, do we have a shopping centre parking lot with capacity=100, or should
we have capacity:"vehicle"=60; capacity:motorbike=10; capacity:disabled=10;
capacity:prams***=6; capacity:ev_charging=4;
capacity:(temporary/short_term/click'n'collect)=5; capacity:loading=5

***=prams - I'm not sure if they're yet a thing in OSM?, but that's
carparks marked as reserved for parents with prams eg
https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.0997524,153.4253639,3a,64.7y,77.23h,72.17t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3e6IiMfvLC7DrZq1RA4TUA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200809/d6e363bd/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list