[Tagging] oneway=yes on motorways
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Aug 14 20:09:40 UTC 2020
It is nicer to avoid contradictions, but I am not planning to work on this specific case.
If you want you may propose specific edit and post it here for review
(or make it and discuss if someone disagrees).
"Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.
Aug 14, 2020, 20:35 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:
> So, should this contradiction be eliminated from the wiki or not?
>
>
>
> Às 09:32 de 26/05/2020, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging escreveu:
>
>> Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even not ideal and
>> ask for a review.
>>
>> "Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.
>>
>> May 26, 2020, 10:58 by >> voschix at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>> Please come back to my original question: >>> I would like to eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <>>> jm at liotier.org>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that the JOSM style
>>>>>> that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not show ways
>>>>>> properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a bug in the
>>>>>> style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this. If anything, it gives validators more to work with if you start doing something weird.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Isn't that what oneway=no is for ?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200814/d7469bd3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list