[Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 06:42:13 UTC 2020

We've been doing it for years for ferries, so in that case I agree that
it's somewhat overkill.

In the case of transferring to a train or bus, I don't think it's overkill
to be explicit about it though. It seems really odd to me to have railway
ways or highway ways with bicycle=no|use_sidepath as members of a bicycle
route relation, which is what would happen in the case of the specialised
bus that takes bicycles through a tunnel.

The alternative is that we change the validator to disregard ways with the
role transport. Sure that would work as well.


On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:16 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 31/8/20 8:25 am, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> > Keep it simple, if the simple solution does not limit you.
> >
> Agreed. I see no reason why a way as a member of a simple route relation
> could not have the role 'transport'.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200831/b92bceb5/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list