[Tagging] Cartpath RFC

[Mike Thompson]

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:58 PM Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 00:47, Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If I was on a golf course and I saw a sign that said "cart path", or I
>> was looking at a map specifically of a golf course, I would know what "cart
>> path" meant based on context.  If I saw a general map with the term "cart
>> path", or if the term came up in general conversation, I either wouldn't
>> know to what it referred, or I would assume it was a path for animal drawn
>> carts as another person posted in this thread.
>>
>
> Those were my thoughts, too.  But then I looked at the proposal.
> In the context of golf=cart_path there is no ambiguity.  I expect
> others may object to the golf key rather than the highway key,
> but with the golf key it's not ambiguous.
>
Perhaps I am missing something, but I am not seeing golf=cart_path as part
of the proposal (other than to say "Depreciate:golf=cartpath").

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201223/273b2867/attachment.htm>