[Tagging] How to tag an utilitarian fountain?
António Madeira
antoniomadeira at gmx.com
Tue Feb 4 15:33:11 UTC 2020
Thank you for your input and collaboration in clarifying this important
issue regarding fountains.
I agree with your changes and I'll adapt it also in the Portuguese wiki.
I also thank to everyone who participated and helped discuss this.
Regards,
António.
Às 12:21 de 04/02/2020, European Water Project escreveu:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
> I have made the following changes to the wiki page - which I think
> makes it clearer that amenity=fountain && drinking_water=yes is an
> acceptable tag pair for fountains of historic or cultural significance
> which serve potable water.
>
> Feel free to amend or reverse them if you feel they are inconsistent.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stuart
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> OLD SENTENCE
>
> The water of those fountains is often not suitable for drinking.
>
> OLD SENTENCE
>
> The water of fountains tagged as amenity=fountain is often not
> drinkable – especially the large ornamental ones.
>
> OLD SENTENCE
>
> If providing drinking water is not the primary use of a fountain but
> the water is drinkable nonetheless use drinking_water
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drinking_water>=yes (see the
> tag page for more detailed tagging).
>
> OLD SENTENCE
>
> Please tag a drinking fountain which does not meet the tag criteria,
> such as a modern metal fountain in a train station as
> amenity=drinking_water. <br><br>If the fountain provides drinking
> water and meets the requisites for being tagged as a fountain, add an
> additional tag drinking_water
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drinking_water>=yes (see the
> tag page for more detailed tagging).
>
> Also :
>
> I have added pictures of three fountains meeting the above criteria
> which dispense drinking water. 1) Paris,France 2) Trento, Italy, 3)
> Lorigo, Portugal
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 14:15, European Water Project
> <europeanwaterproject at gmail.com
> <mailto:europeanwaterproject at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you Martin,
>
> I will make some limited changes, which I believe are consistent
> with the recent discussions, to make it clearer that a fountain -
> which deserves that name - can also have a utilitarian function of
> delivering drinking water. I will also add a couple more photos
> of historic fountains which serve potable water.
>
> After making these changes, I will send out a summary note to this
> list just to be on the safe side.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stuart
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 14:02, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Am Di., 4. Feb. 2020 um 09:15 Uhr schrieb European Water
> Project <europeanwaterproject at gmail.com
> <mailto:europeanwaterproject at gmail.com>>:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I agree with Antonio that the wiki is too ambiguous and
> needs a bit of clean up, including more image examples of
> drinking fountains which merit to be tagged as
>
> amenity=fountain
> drinking_water=yes
>
> What is the best practice process for making controlled
> contributions to the wiki pages ?
>
>
>
> there are no controlled contributions to the wiki ;-)
> If you feel the page needs clarification or other improvement,
> you can either discuss them beforehand, for example here (or
> maybe on the talk-page in the wiki, but that may be a longer
> process), or you just perform them an see what happens :)
> It really depends how much your edit is consistent with the
> views of the other "contributors" (particularily those who
> guard the wiki), how much you are going to change, in which
> domain (userpages, tag pages, organisational pages, summary
> pages, pages for beginners, etc.) of the wiki you are editing,
> etc.
> There is no clear answer to your question.
>
> From my point of view, any fountain where you are starting to
> think that it might get the amenity=fountain tag probably
> should get this tag.
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200204/df584cb3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list