[Tagging] recreational vs functional routes

[Florimond Berthoux]

Le sam. 11 janv. 2020 à 22:22, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> a écrit
:
>
>  Florimond Berthoux <florimond.berthoux at gmail.com>:
>>
>> So I propose to use for bicycle route
>> bicycle:type=trekking/road_bike/commute/mtb
>>
>
> I don't think commute is a type of bicycle? Trekking maybe, but here in
Nederland they call a lot of bicycles "trekking" when they are really just
city bikes with a few extra gears and some fancy accessories.
> We also don't have a type "road bike". We do have "Omafiets"
(Grandmother's bike), mainly used by schoolgirls and young women.
Grandmothers have e-bikes, nowadays.

bicycle:type describe the type of cycle activity of the route not precisely
the type of the bicycle. (Though commuter bike is a type of bicycle and you
have road biking in Netherland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_National_Road_Race_Championships).
So values should be (if my english is right):
bicycle:type=trekking/road_biking/commuting/mtb

-- 
Florimond Berthoux
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200112/94d82ef0/attachment.htm>