[Tagging] RFC free_water

European Water Project europeanwaterproject at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 20:47:24 UTC 2020


3. Re: RFC free_water (Alessandro Sarretta)

>>>> Francois, Florimond, Alessandro,

First, thanks to all of you for taking so much time to reflect on this
subject which is core to our project.

I see three concepts that need to be described.

1. Is there free water available ?
2. For whom is it free ? if it is the case that there is free water
available
3. If it is free for everyone, can you bring your own container ?.

Here are some alternatives which seem to be getting traction for each of
the three concepts. I have removed free_water as it doesn't seem to be
getting consensus.

After feedback, I will update the draft proposal.

For 1.
charge:water=<free/fee>
drinking_water:fee=yes/no
tap_water:free=yes/no/customers


For 2.
access:water = <yes/no/customers>
tap_water=yes/no/customers
drinking_water:access=yes/no/customers

For 3.
container:water = <bring_own/provided>
tap_water:container=*

Best regards,

Stuart


>
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:25:28 +0100
> From: Alessandro Sarretta <alessandro.sarretta at gmail.com>
> To: tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] RFC free_water
> Message-ID: <9665c5e1-9a9b-e388-bff6-56366974b9aa at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi,
>
> On 17/01/20 12:08, European Water Project wrote:
> >
> >      2. Re: RFC free_water (François Lacombe)
> >
> >
> > I see your point and agree it would be preferable to develop a more
> > generalize nomenclature, but also think it is important to choose
> > something that is understandable to a newbie.
> >
> > If we chose charge:water
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=free
>
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>we
>
> > would need to differentiate when the water is free to anyone (yes in
> > OSM speak) or just paying customers (customers in OSM speak).
> >
> > We could use :
> > charge:water
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=<free
>
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1
> >/fee>
> > access = <yes/no/customers>
> > container = <bring_own/provided>
> >
> > In the above, European Water Project would only include cafés, bars,
> > etc. with
> > charge:water
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=free
>
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1
> >
> > access = yes
> > container = bring_own
>
> If you use the tag /access/ alone, it could refer to the "main" feature
> (the bar or restaurant...).
>
> And water is probably too general... I try suggesting to use
> /tap_water/, that should clearly state that is not bottle water :-)
>
> So it could be:
>
>   * tap_water=yes/no/customers
>   * tap_water:free=yes/no/customers
>   * tap_water:container=*
>
> This way it seems to me you should be able to cover all the
> possibilities clearly.
>
> m2c
>
> Ale
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200117/b7f56b29/attachment.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 120
> *****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200117/7b967655/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list