[Tagging] site relations for city walls?

[Matthew Woehlke]

On 15/07/2020 03.33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Also you should not have 2 objects amenity=parking which cover the same
> area (regardless of additional tags).

Do you mean having that on both the relation and the areas?

> Am Mi., 15. Juli 2020 um 01:40 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
>> Even so, is a multipolygon giving any information that couldn't be had
>> by separate parking areas with the appropriate operator tag?
> 
> +1, this is what I would choose, no relation at all. It is also what you
> can probably argue for "on the ground": two parkings operated by the same
> business, not one parking spread over 2 areas.

Okay, I'm curious now, how would you treat 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117565094 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117565096. IMO those are both part of 
"the same lot", split across a road, or at least they are parking for 
the same place (SPAC). For that matter, I think most people would 
consider my original example, or certainly Delmonico’s next door (west) 
as a single lot.

>>> (BTW, is there any accepted way to tag a 'carry-out only' space?)
> 
> there is the "maxstay" tag which can be used with a value like 5 or 15
> minutes.
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/maxstay#values

Yes, but a) there is no explicit time limit (maxstay=carry-out?), and b) 
how do you apply that to only some spaces?

Of course, now that I've mentioned it, how do you note that 2 out of 20 
spaces are maxstay=15? (I've seen that...)

-- 
Matthew