[Tagging] Help explain the difference between path and track
bradhaack at fastmail.com
Tue Jun 9 21:00:26 UTC 2020
A track does have a different function, it can handle a 2 track vehicle,
a path can't.
If functional is sacrosanct, why do we have motorway? A motorway
could just be a trunk or primary with extra tags denoting limited access.
On 6/9/20 2:11 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM brad <bradhaack at fastmail.com
> <mailto:bradhaack at fastmail.com>> wrote:
> > It already says this:
> > "Some highway=track are used for various leisure activities -
> hiking, cycling, or as jeep/ATV trails. "
> > on the track wiki.
> Right, there is nothing that says that a track cannot be used for
> additional purposes, only that its primary function is agricultural or
> > I propose changing the path page from this:
> > "If a path is wide enough for 4-wheel-vehicles (wider than 2 m), and
> it is not legally signposted or otherwise only allowed for
> pedestrians, cyclists or horseriders, it is often better tagged as a
> highway=track or highway=service. "
> > to this:
> > "If a path is wide enough for 4-wheel-vehicles (wider than 2 m), it
> is often better tagged as a highway=track or highway=service. "
> 1) So we are getting away from the whole notion of "functional
> classification"? highway=track will only be a proxy for some
> physical/legal access characteristics?
> 2) If we are going to use this definition I would propose stronger
> language than "often better tagged", perhaps "should almost always be
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging