[Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

[Francesco Ansanelli]

Dear all,

I discussed with local mappers about the need of a role "take_train" or
"public_transport" to fix bicycle routes...
Would anybody be so kind to make a proposal about this post?

Many thanks
Cheers
Francesco

Il giorno lun 16 dic 2019 alle ore 13:49 Francesco Ansanelli <
francians at gmail.com> ha scritto:

>
>
> Il lun 16 dic 2019, 10:56 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> On 16/12/19 20:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 10:02 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt <
>> voschix at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Can we come back to talking about a solution.
>>> Maybe an appropriate new role value could be a solution: role=take_train
>>> on the corresponding train section in the bicycle route, for example.
>>> However, this would provide an easy way to add train ride details.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I would add the train route relation as member, rather than the
>> individual railway ways.
>>
>> If the entire train route is used then ok. But if only a section is used
>> then I think the relevant ways only should be included.
>>
>> If a simple dataconsumer is not aware, it would should a hole in the
>> bicycle relation (what IMHO is a good way to show that there is something
>> special, in particular that you cannot simply ride your bike there), while
>> a data consumer who specifically understands the situation could give
>> specific directions. I agree a specific role also seems reasonable (could
>> be extended to ferries, trams, aerialways, etc.)
>>
>>
>> role=take_train would not work for ferries, buses, canoes etc.
>>
>>
>> I think role=transport could work .. provided the way identifies what
>> form of transport is used ... that could be a problem for bus routes?
>>
>> role=transport_train/transport_bus???
>>
>
>
> I agree with the 'transport' name, it's the same I was thinking too...
> Also 'transport_relation' could be fine.
> Since you are adding a relation as segment you will get the type of
> relation from it.
> At this point I'd remove all information from the rail, do a relation ptv2
> and add that to my route.
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200618/df9504a5/attachment.htm>