[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - Qanat"

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Jun 21 08:04:38 UTC 2020




Jun 21, 2020, 09:05 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 21. Jun 2020, at 03:02, Joseph Guillaume <josephguillaume at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It would be like mapping every fountain as historic.
>>
>> They're often not considered of historic interest locally, let alone nationally or internationally.
>>
>> Hope this clarifies my thinking...
>>
>
>
> you are raising the bar higher than it is. Every memorial is tagged as historic for example. Historic is a key like any other. Maybe historic=yes has a requirement for some significance (eg amenity=fountain historic =yes), but there isn’t for historic=x, eg there aren’t memorials that don’t “deserve” historic=memorial
>
It may be desirable to avoid repeat of historic=wayside_shrine failure where due to lack of alternative
it is widely used to tag modern shrines and ones that are not beside a road

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200621/59734911/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list