[Tagging] Updating definition and description of place=square
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 02:21:07 UTC 2020
sent from a phone
> On 23. Mar 2020, at 23:03, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:
> (seriously, New York
> is not part of New England)
pardon my ignorance ;-)
> does not use sqaure in the name and is not place=square.
it looks like a square on the map and “plaza” seems a synonym for square, or not?
Also this could be a square:
> could be, but it could also just be a bit of grass.
agreed, it doesn’t appear to have a name related to a square.
> That's fine, but the point is not that we have zero things in the US
> that meet the Euro definition of square. It is that we have many things
> that have square in the name that do not, and therefore that inhabitants
> of the US, or at least New England, do not relate at all to the EURO
> definition of square.
> Here is the most well known thing named square in New England (six
looks like a square and has the name, which part of the definition does not fit?
> Here's another example of someting with Square in the name that is not a
if we are speaking about the big parking triangle, I would see it as a square.
More information about the Tagging