[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Recreational route relation roles

[Yves]

"Applies to

All  and  part of a relation tagged withtype=route and route=hiking or route=foot or route=bicycle or any other recreational route type." 

I was thinking of route=piste, used for cross-country skiing or snowshoeing. I'd better leave out this part unless discussed in the context of other recreational routes. I don't see in the current proposal any showstopper, but who knows? 
Once accepted, it will be easy enough to extend to other route=* relations as fit. 
Yves 



Le 20 mai 2020 13:33:26 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Please review and comment on this proposal:
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles
>
>
>Definition: specification of role values for members of a recreational
>route relation
>
>The status has changed to proposed as of today
>
>Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here.  Please note that
>this
>proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and documented.
>
>Thanks for helping to finally get this done!
>
>Best, Peter Elderson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200520/e896a9c0/attachment-0001.htm>