[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Recreational route relation roles

[Yves]

Yeah, I've seen the pattern of route=piste for ways, I guess it is a case of newbies over-gardening.
Don't specifically exclude route=piste from your proposal: my point was to completely omit 'other recreational routes' if you don't master them to avoid unnecessary discussion.
When the proposal is accepted, you can have a look at taginfo and reach out to those route=* wiki page to inform that the new accepted proposal may be of interest. 

Le 20 mai 2020 18:27:24 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Thanks, I see that route=piste was approved and has its own role
>definition. Strangely enough, the tag is applied more often to ways
>then to
>relations, that does not seem to fit in the tag definition.
>
>I meant the roles proposal to be generic, but I'll include the
>route=piste
>relation as an exception.  Any other exceptions?
>
>Peter Elderson
>
>
>Op wo 20 mei 2020 om 17:37 schreef Yves <yvecai at mailbox.org>:
>
>> "Applies to
>>
>> All  and  part of a relation tagged
>> withtype=route and route=hiking or route=foot or route=bicycle or any
>other
>> recreational route type."
>>
>> I was thinking of route=piste, used for cross-country skiing or
>> snowshoeing. I'd better leave out this part unless discussed in the
>context
>> of other recreational routes. I don't see in the current proposal any
>> showstopper, but who knows?
>> Once accepted, it will be easy enough to extend to other route=*
>relations
>> as fit.
>> Yves
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 20 mai 2020 13:33:26 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson
><pelderson at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>> Please review and comment on this proposal:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles
>>>
>>>
>>> Definition: specification of role values for members of a
>recreational
>>> route relation
>>>
>>> The status has changed to proposed as of today
>>>
>>> Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here.  Please note
>that
>>> this proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and
>documented.
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping to finally get this done!
>>>
>>> Best, Peter Elderson
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200521/45aab57d/attachment.htm>