[Tagging] remove “rendering” from proposal template

Paul Allen pla16021 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 25 12:52:21 UTC 2021


On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 12:27, Christoph Hormann <osm at imagico.de> wrote:

>
> It would be of high value, also beyond the scope of OSM alone, to collect
> and document such ideas from a broad range of cultural backgrounds world
> wide - much more than just putting up a mockup illustration of the first
> symbol that comes to mind for the writer of a proposal showing how they -
> to put it bluntly - would imagine this to be shown in the map after
> thinking about it for five minutes.
>

Some suggested rendering has been poorly-conceived after a few minutes of
thought.  And some suggested rendering has been the result of looking at the
issue of how to tag a particular type of object.  The proposal author may
have gained insights after looking deeply at the issue, digging out example
images of the feature itself, possibly including signage, etc. that would
require similar amounts of work by carto people trying to figure out how to
represent the object.

Nobody is saying carto people are incapable of coming up with rendering
or that the proposer's wishes should override carto people, just that some
time and effort might be saved by coming up with a suggestion.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210425/3105024d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list