[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

[Peter Elderson]

I think landscaping is an activity, a craft or an art maybe. Not a kind of
object or covering. I think it is better to map what you see and can be
clearly verified by anyone looking at it, not what you know or suspect has
happened to make it look like that.

Peter Elderson


Op do 4 feb. 2021 om 13:42 schreef Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org>:

> From all discussion, I get the feeling that both a new landuse or natural
> value are not going to succeed because it is controversial to add a new
> value. Some will, I think correct, oppose because it would fragment the
> vegetation tagging even further
>
> I had a discussion with ZeLonewolf on Discord. Would there be support for
> a tag like landscaping=*? Possible values could be shrubbery | grass |
> trees/forest | flowerbed etc. For example on the following image:
> https://i.imgur.com/w4gAW6D.png 1 would be tagged as natural=wood ( leave
> the discussion about how to tag the forest for now), 2 as
> landscaping=grass, and 3 as natural=tree. If 2 would have been low
> shrubbery for decoration, landscaping=shrubbery would be sufficient.
>
> This tagging scheme would still honor for example natural=scrub from
> scrublands and natural=shrub from individual shrubs. Also, the landuse tag
> would be left untouched and still available to only tag real landuse (like
> residential and industrial).
>
> Additionally, landscaping=* would allow to also properly tag the content
> of a leisure=garden and leisure=park in more detail.
>
> Is this a workable solution?
>
> Kind regards,
> Vincent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210204/597898c6/attachment.htm>