[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush
Brian M. Sperlongano
zelonewolf at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 16:34:43 UTC 2021
This might be a language difference, but in US English "landscaping" is
also used as a noun to describe an area of human-created plants or other
natural objects that are groomed for aesthetic or decorative purposes. It
includes lawns, cultivated beds of bushes and shrubs, etc.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021, 11:30 AM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think landscaping is an activity, a craft or an art maybe. Not a kind of
> object or covering. I think it is better to map what you see and can be
> clearly verified by anyone looking at it, not what you know or suspect has
> happened to make it look like that.
>
> Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op do 4 feb. 2021 om 13:42 schreef Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>
>> From all discussion, I get the feeling that both a new landuse or natural
>> value are not going to succeed because it is controversial to add a new
>> value. Some will, I think correct, oppose because it would fragment the
>> vegetation tagging even further
>>
>> I had a discussion with ZeLonewolf on Discord. Would there be support for
>> a tag like landscaping=*? Possible values could be shrubbery | grass |
>> trees/forest | flowerbed etc. For example on the following image:
>> https://i.imgur.com/w4gAW6D.png 1 would be tagged as natural=wood (
>> leave the discussion about how to tag the forest for now), 2 as
>> landscaping=grass, and 3 as natural=tree. If 2 would have been low
>> shrubbery for decoration, landscaping=shrubbery would be sufficient.
>>
>> This tagging scheme would still honor for example natural=scrub from
>> scrublands and natural=shrub from individual shrubs. Also, the landuse tag
>> would be left untouched and still available to only tag real landuse (like
>> residential and industrial).
>>
>> Additionally, landscaping=* would allow to also properly tag the content
>> of a leisure=garden and leisure=park in more detail.
>>
>> Is this a workable solution?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Vincent
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210204/37b324b2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list