[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

Brian M. Sperlongano zelonewolf at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 17:00:39 UTC 2021


Of course both of these exist - if it's just a "let nature take its course"
area, we definitely would NOT describe that as landscaping.  Landscaped
areas are groomed and maintained to be aesthetically pleasing :)

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:52 AM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks! So it's like street decoration using naturally growing elements.
>
> Most patches of greenery I encounter do not qualify as groomed or
> cultivated though. Most are just space filling, discouraging
> walking through, let nature take it's course as long as it's within the
> parcel limits,  enclosed green patches between loops of a cloverleaf
> motorway junction.
>
> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op do 4 feb. 2021 om 17:37 schreef Brian M. Sperlongano <
> zelonewolf at gmail.com>:
>
>> This might be a language difference, but in US English "landscaping" is
>> also used as a noun to describe an area of human-created plants or other
>> natural objects that are groomed for aesthetic or decorative purposes.  It
>> includes lawns, cultivated beds of bushes and shrubs,  etc.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021, 11:30 AM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think landscaping is an activity, a craft or an art maybe. Not a kind
>>> of object or covering. I think it is better to map what you see and can be
>>> clearly verified by anyone looking at it, not what you know or suspect has
>>> happened to make it look like that.
>>>
>>> Peter Elderson
>>>
>>>
>>> Op do 4 feb. 2021 om 13:42 schreef Vincent van Duijnhoven via Tagging <
>>> tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>>>
>>>> From all discussion, I get the feeling that both a new landuse or
>>>> natural value are not going to succeed because it is controversial to add a
>>>> new value. Some will, I think correct, oppose because it would fragment the
>>>> vegetation tagging even further
>>>>
>>>> I had a discussion with ZeLonewolf on Discord. Would there be support
>>>> for a tag like landscaping=*? Possible values could be shrubbery | grass |
>>>> trees/forest | flowerbed etc. For example on the following image:
>>>> https://i.imgur.com/w4gAW6D.png 1 would be tagged as natural=wood (
>>>> leave the discussion about how to tag the forest for now), 2 as
>>>> landscaping=grass, and 3 as natural=tree. If 2 would have been low
>>>> shrubbery for decoration, landscaping=shrubbery would be sufficient.
>>>>
>>>> This tagging scheme would still honor for example natural=scrub from
>>>> scrublands and natural=shrub from individual shrubs. Also, the landuse tag
>>>> would be left untouched and still available to only tag real landuse (like
>>>> residential and industrial).
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, landscaping=* would allow to also properly tag the
>>>> content of a leisure=garden and leisure=park in more detail.
>>>>
>>>> Is this a workable solution?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Vincent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210204/c07cffe4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list