[Tagging] Is landuse=winter_sports a ‘de facto’ tag for ski areas?

[Yves]

Agreed that leisure=winter_sports instead of landuse would avoid the usual drama associated with the later.

But, given the very slow pace of mapping such areas, I would advocate against depreciating, discouraging or whatever.
(>4400 at skimaps.org, http://www.opensnowmap.org/qa/OSM_vs_skimap_missing_at_OSM/). 

Maybe a rationale is needed, so here's one: during winter where this tag is most useful, hopefully snow covers everything and summertime landuse is not that used anymore, hence the overlap/intersection.
Yves - Opensnowmap 

Le 6 février 2021 10:20:07 GMT+01:00, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at gmx.at> a écrit :
>On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 10:08:36 +0100 (CET)
>Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> Which rule? landuse=* polygons may overlap
>> 
>> (landuse=flowerbed inside landuse=industrial inside landuse=military
>> that partially overlaps with landuse=forest is a valid tagging,
>> even if I would select different key for landuse=flowerbed)
>
>No, the ways themselves should not overlap. One area might be enclosed
>by another one. The better word than overlap would have been intersect.
>Just like with outers of MPs.
>-- 
>Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210206/35a4a64c/attachment-0001.htm>