[Tagging] Is landuse=winter_sports a ‘de facto’ tag for ski areas?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

> Le 8 février 2021 04:29:45 GMT+01:00, Stefan Tauner <> stefan.tauner at gmx.at> > a écrit :
>
> However, the basic idea of the landuse key is to "describe the primary
> use of land". There can't be two primary uses.
>
Such documentation requires improvements.

We definitely can have landuse=forest in landuse=military
and landuse=flowerbed in landuse=residential

If you hate landuse=flowerbed you can try inventing tag 
for alternative tagging and convince mappers and preset
authors to switch to it.

It may be quite hard, but if you care about purity of landuse key
it is far better than waiting till it will become as entrenched as
landuse=forest is.

Feb 8, 2021, 06:20 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:

>
>
> Le 8 février 2021 04:29:45 GMT+01:00, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at gmx.at> a écrit :
> >On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:06:11 +1000
> >Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
> >However, the basic idea of the landuse key is to "describe the primary
> >use of land". There can't be two primary uses.
>
> I'm not so sure, depends if you're a soldier, a gardener or a sheep after all.
> The flowerbed cut by the military area fence example : it would seems really artificial to cut it.
>
In case of a fence splitting flowerbed could make sense.

But I have seen case of a really long flowerbed forming one object - and going
along road, not interrupted from clearly residential area to clearly
retail area.

Splitting flowerbed forming one floral arrangement just because surrounding
land use changes would be silly.

Or cases where I can link mapped area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.4843&mlon=15.7111#map=16/53.4843/15.7111
military/forest

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.08192&mlon=19.90083#map=19/50.08192/19.90083
park and tree covered area are crossing, similarly playground
may be shared by two named residential areas and be in both at once

landuse=construction may freely overlap with basically anything
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210208/dc52e37b/attachment-0001.htm>