[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

[Paul Allen]

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 21:37, Daniel Capilla <dcapillae at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am preparing a draft proposal for "historic=cemetery". The proposal is
> very simple. However, as this is the first time I am preparing a
> proposal, I am open to any suggestions.


Your proposal says "The most obvious alternative for mapping a historic
cemetery
would be landuse=cemetery + historic=yes.  Indeed it is.  It's how I'd do
it.
It's how others have done it.

Your proposal then goes on to say "This tagging has the disadvantage of
being
unspecific."  In what way is historic=cemetery more specific than
landuse=cemetery + historic=yes?  Both specify a historic cemetery.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210209/1037b74d/attachment.htm>