[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

[Daniel Capilla]

+1

El 11/2/21 a las 18:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging escribió:
>
>
>
> Feb 11, 2021, 18:32 by pla16021 at gmail.com:
>
>     On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 00:41, Daniel Capilla <dcapillae at gmail.com
>     <mailto:dcapillae at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Many historic cemeteries are included in a list of authorised
>         heritage registrers.
>
>
>     I don't think it's explicitly stated anywhere on the wiki, but to
>     be listed in an
>     authoritative heritage register means that it is of historic
>     significance.  To
>     that extent, historic=* means "Of historical significance but not
>     listed in
>     a heritage register."  If you've added heritage tags then
>     historic=* is
>     not really necessary.
>
> Adding historic tags to objects tagged as registered as heritage is
> 100% fine.
>
> Note especially historic=wayside_shrine, historic=memorial etc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210211/3598cd85/attachment-0001.htm>