[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Fr., 12. Feb. 2021 um 01:47 Uhr schrieb Diego Cruz <ginkarasu at gmail.com>:

> That's exactly my point. If you merely use historic=yes, you don't know if
> it's historically relevant as a palace or as a museum.
>



actually my point was different: if you have an object with building=* and
tourism=museum, the problem is already there, at the root there is a
modelling problem. historic=museum or historic=building would be able to
solve this ambiguity, but not in a sustainable way. You would have to
disambiguate all other properties as well, because you have one object
which represents 2 entities: a museum (institution) and a building.

Once you have sorted out this ambiguity by having an object for each of the
things you want to represent, historic=yes as an attribute would work just
fine.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210212/80fc7d40/attachment-0001.htm>