[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

[António Madeira]

Seeing it from that perspective, I have to agree with that ambiguity,
but that also means that we should have a museum=historic tag, which,
curiously, has 3 uses in the database.


Às 21:12 de 11/02/2021, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
> Am Fr., 12. Feb. 2021 um 01:08 Uhr schrieb António Madeira
> <antoniomadeira at gmx.com <mailto:antoniomadeira at gmx.com>>:
>
>     In this case, you could also tag that as tourism=museum +
>     building=palace + historic=yes.
>
>
>
> a historic museum? Or a historic palace? Or both?
> Usually I would not combine building and museum in the same object.
>
>
>     In this matter, I agree with Paul. historic=* should only be used
>     as an attribute, not as a first level tag. I don't see any reason
>     to use it otherwise.
>
>
>
> the reason is that it is an established tag for lots of things, for
> example archaeological sites, memorials, monuments, wayside shrines etc.
>
> Cheers
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210211/7ea2b372/attachment.htm>