[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forestry(_compartment) relations (Was "Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forest(_compartment) relations")

[David Marchal]

Dear mappers and taggers,

The boundary=forestry(_compartment) proposal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforestry(_compartment)_relations) has recently known significant changes: it now

- deprecates landuse=forest, as it replaces it and removes its confusion between forestry areas and wooded areas;
- designates natural=wood for modelling wooded areas, managed or not;
- deprecates landcover=trees, which is a duplicate of natural=wood;
- includes more explainations and examples about the problems with current tagging and how the new tagging proposes to handle them.

Thanks to all people who reviewed the proposal and made suggestions or asked for clarifications! Do you folks have questions or comments the proposal still does not address?

Awaiting your answers,

Regards.

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210213/03c859b9/attachment.htm>