[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shrubbery

[Vincent van Duijnhoven]

It was also brought to my attention yesterday that all values in the natural key are singular. Shrubs is plural. For consistency, this value should also be singular. That leaves two options
1) Repurpose natural=shrub to also be applied on areas rather than only nodes. The downside of this is that it only differs 1 letter from natural=scrub which might cause confusion
2) Use natural=shrubbery which according to the definition seems to cover everything I was trying to get covered with the proposal.

In the coming days, I will also work on the definition in the proposal based on all the feedback provided.

Kind regards,
Vincent
________________________________
Van: Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
Verzonden: woensdag 24 februari 2021 23:35
Aan: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shrubbery

I would vote yes for either, but the issue with shrubs vs shrubbery, is that shrubs seems to exclude elements of landscaping that are not strictly a shrub, but are part of an overall landscaped area, such as a mulch bed or non-shrub plants.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021, 5:25 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com<mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:



On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 18:34, Vincent van Duijnhoven <vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com<mailto:vvanduijnhoven at outlook.com>> wrote:
Besides Bert, are the more people who prefer natural=shrubs over natural=shrubbery?

Yep, me :-)

Thanks

Graeme

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftagging&data=04%7C01%7C%7C0ce4ccf2cacf4cc6fadd08d8d914b28f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637498030214317389%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=CgDPnBm9CvpvyHr7oC%2BfY%2BzjxLVDy2KrCcaWi4Rwezc%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210225/f3167cc8/attachment-0001.htm>