[Tagging] Proposed feature - Voting - electricity
lrichert at posteo.de
Fri Jan 1 14:18:58 UTC 2021
The idea of tagging this is that if someone, e.g a traveller, shows up
to charge something they can reasonably assume if something is tagged
electricity=yes that they will be able to charge their phone/laptop etc.
If something is tagged as intermittent, then there is a significant
chance that usage of electricity won't be possible. For context, people
in the US experience 1.1 outages/yr and thus most sources there would
likely be classified as reliable, whereas a country like Ghana
experiences 1.5 interruptions per week.
I don't intend for this to be used to map if someone should really
consider investing in a UPS - no one should need to hook up there
hospital devices on a whim in a cafe and then need to have a perfect
power supply. Tagging the quality of electricity is outside of the scope
of the proposal and if necessary a separate one should be drawn up.
Also, scheduled power cuts are not included in the intermittent outage
count - the schedule should then be tagged as electricity:conditional=*
On 01/01/2021 14:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>> On 1. Jan 2021, at 14:19, Lukas Richert <lrichert at posteo.de> wrote:
>> I would say common sense dictates that not having electricity for
>> some minutes 2-3 times a year does not represent a significant
>> probability that electricity will be unavailable.
> but it means that while it would be generally available you could not
> really rely on it, btw. even if the outage was some seconds and not
>> As mentioned in the paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2020.106828
>> <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2020.106828>, it seems that there is
>> no clear definition of what constitutes reliable electricity access.
>> The definition proposed in the linked paper: an electricity source is
>> reliable if "a maximum threshold of 12 outages in a typical year for
>> SAIFI and 12 hours of power outage per year" is not exceeded. This
>> seems reasonable and could be included to define what "significant"
>> means in this case.
> I don’t share this conclusion, having in average an outage per month
> would be seen quite unreliable in some contexts. Definitely worth
> getting a power backup / UPS. For example I never spent a thought on
> power backups in Germany, because it happened at most once every few
> years, while after moving to Italy I found that almost everybody using
> a desktop computer had an UPS, and for good reason, several outages
> (seconds usually) a year made it a good investment also for home use.
> Now in both countries it is probably safe to say that there is
> complete (there are of course many remote places with no coverage,
> like alpin huts etc., complete regarding settlements) and
> uninterrupted coverage, but regarding reliability, the differences -
> while neglectible compared to what was discussed here, 3 hours a day
> without electricity - are still significant.
> From my point of view, 12 outages a year are not what I’d call
> reliable. I am aware that other regions of the globe would be very
> happy with this kind of service. For which context is this tagging
> thought for?
> Cheers Martin
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging