[Tagging] Proposed Feature - Voting - Electricity
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Jan 21 10:37:57 UTC 2021
Jonathan Haas now phrased much better what I was trying to express and noticed a bit wider
"I feel it is not well defined what electricity=yes actually means. Does it mean the building
has electricity, or the electricity is available to a visitor/guest? Or putting it another way,
what is the implied value of electricity:access=* if it isn't present? If it just means that the
building has electricity, tagging electricity=yes is useless in most developed countries, as
that should be implied. If it means the electricity is available to guests
(like in the café/campsite example), that means the tagging doesn't make sense for
Jan 20, 2021, 22:02 by lrichert at posteo.de:
> Hi Mateusz,
> the proposal doesn't encourage pointless spam. I have already said that I agree with you and will add that language into the final wiki page, although I personally think that it is a given that one shouldn't tag things when there is a clear default. Abstain from the vote if you must - I asked often enough if there were any other small fixes that need doing, but I strongly object to the word > encouraging> in your text. Encouraging would be if I explicitly asked people to tag this on every public amenity, which I don't.
> Unfortunately I can't change the wording during the vote but this is a truly minor change that can be done afterward. You seem to be trying to find any reason to vote against it - it's quite tiring - instead of focussing on the substance of the proposal.
> Regards, Lukas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging